*Information as of July 1, 2024

*Please be advised that these questions include expressions that may be sensitive for individuals connected to Fukushima Prefecture. Based on a preliminary survey conducted by the Reconstruction Agency, these questions are designed to address the candid inquiries many international individuals have about Fukushima, making them easily accessible for those seeking information.

Reconstruction Efforts in Fukushima

  • Q
    How are reconstruction efforts going in Fukushima?

    Reconstruction efforts are making steady progress in various areas including safety, infrastructure, tourism, exports, and so on.

  • Q
    Are there tourists in Fukushima?

    As reconstruction efforts continue, an increasing number of people from Japan and abroad are visiting Fukushima.

  • Q
    What tourist attractions, facilities and food are popular with international visitors in Fukushima?

    Fukushima Prefecture stands out for its breathtaking nature. It also boasts a rich history, soothing hot springs, delicious food, and more—there’s too much to mention to fit into this answer.

Safety in Fukushima

  • Q
    What are the radiation dose levels in Fukushima Prefecture?

    Dose levels in the major cities of Fukushima Prefecture are no different than in Tokyo or other major cities around the world.

  • Q
    How are radiation dose levels being measured?

    Ambient dose rates are measured by portable monitoring posts and real-time dosimetry systems. The measurement results are published on a government agency's website every 10 minutes.

  • Q
    Is all of Fukushima Prefecture contaminated with radiation?

    The removal of radioactive materials has been completed in the areas marked for decontamination, excluding the Difficult-to-Return Zones.

  • Q
    Are radiation dose levels high around the power station?

    Although certain areas have comparatively high dose levels, those have entry restrictions in place.

  • Q
    Is Fukushima habitable?

    Approximately 97.8% of Fukushima Prefecture is safe for habitation, with around 1.75 million people currently living there, leading normal lives.

  • Q
    Are towns around the power station still out of bounds?

    Entry restrictions remain in place for certain areas, though these zones are significantly fewer in number compared to the period immediately after the disaster.

  • Q
    Is the safety of Fukushima corroborated by a third party?

    The IAEA has assessed that the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station has moved to a stabilized situation. Findings by the WHO and UNSCEAR suggest that future health effects caused by radiation are unlikely to be discernible.

  • Q
    Are the residents of Fukushima Prefecture experiencing any health effects?

    At this point, radiation exposure has not been found to have caused any adverse health effects. Considering the exposure levels following the accident, it is deemed unlikely that it will cause any in the future

  • Q
    Is there a rising number of cancer patients in Fukushima Prefecture?

    Considering the exposure levels following the accident, it is deemed unlikely that there will be an increase in the incidence of cancer.

Safety of food products and drinking water in Fukushima and Japan

  • Q
    Are food products from Fukushima safe?

    Japan’s food safety standards are among the most rigorous in the world and apply to food products throughout the country, including Fukushima. The food products undergo inspections before being distributed on the market.

  • Q
    Do Japanese agricultural, forestry, and fishery products undergo appropriate inspections?

    Inspections are implemented appropriately based on national guidelines. Agricultural products are also assessed by international organizations.

  • Q
    Is the tap water in Fukushima safe?

    Yes. It is safe and suitable for drinking.

  • Q
    What are the results of recent radiation testing?

    In recent years, there have been almost no items that exceed the world’s most stringent levels of standards.

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

  • Q
    How does the damage from the Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi accidents differ?

    There are major differences between the two accidents. In particular, the atmospheric release of radioactivity from the Fukushima Daiichi accident was lower, and at this stage, exposure has not been found to have had any health effects.

  • Q
    What is the present situation at the nuclear power station where the accident occurred?

    Fuel debris remains at the power station, but cooling water is being continuously injected into the reactors, keeping the debris stable.

  • Q
    Do international organizations carry out regular checks regarding the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident?

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has conducted inspections (reviews) five times in the past.

  • Q
    What will happen to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station moving forward?

    We are working towards decommissioning it, which will take around 30-40 years.

ALPS treated water, tritium and monitoring

  • Q
    What is ALPS treated water? How does it differ to contaminated water?

    Contaminated water is water that has come into contact with fuel debris in a reactor building and contains radioactive materials. This water is converted into ALPS treated water by treating it using an advanced liquid processing system (multi-nuclide removal system) and other equipment to remove radioactive materials other than tritium to levels below the regulatory standards.

  • Q
    Why discharge the ALPS treated water? Can’t it be stored?

    Discharging the ALPS treated water is essential to fully utilize the site, including the area where the tanks are installed, to ensure that decommissioning work proceeds safely and without delay.

  • Q
    If ALPS treated water is safe, why is it being stored? Isn’t it only being stored because it’s unsafe?

    It has been technologically possible to discharge the water safely, but the decision to store the water on-site was made in order to fully consider social impacts, such as reputational damage.

  • Q
    Is there a chance of ALPS treated water containing other radioactive materials in addition to tritium?

    Approximately 70% of the water stored in the tanks contains radioactive materials other than tritium at concentrations that exceed regulatory standards. However, before any discharge, this water is repeatedly treated to reduce the concentration of these materials to levels below the regulatory standards.

  • Q
    What is tritium?

    Tritium (hydrogen-3) is a form of hydrogen that exists naturally all around us.

  • Q
    If tritium is a radioactive material, shouldn’t it be dangerous?

    Radiation emitted by tritium is extremely weak and is not dangerous, provided it is in a concentration below regulatory standards.

  • Q
    Does tritium become concentrated in fish? Will eating fish be dangerous?

    No, tritium does not become concentrated in organisms.

  • Q
    What kind of monitoring is implemented when discharging ALPS treated water into the sea?

    When discharging ALPS treated water into the sea, the relevant agencies conduct monitoring of seawater and fishery products taken from near the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station to investigate levels of tritium and other radioactive materials, and the findings are disclosed online.

  • Q
    When discharging ALPS treated water into the sea, what will happen if the monitoring of the local sea area indicates that the discharged water hasn't sufficiently dispersed or another issue is found?

    If the monitoring of the local sea area indicates that the discharged water hasn't sufficiently dispersed or another issue is found, the discharge will be immediately suspended.